Pattern as Memory – What Landscapes Record Kerry Ferguson — Art, Design & Biophilic Research Series Essay | 2026
Citation: Pattern as Memory: What Landscapes Record Ferguson, K. (2026). Pattern as Memory: What Landscapes Record. Kerry Ferguson — Art, Design & Biophilic Research Series.
Landscapes remember. They record events through physical change. Water cuts into stone. Roots fracture surfaces. Fire alters vegetation. Sediments accumulate. Rivers change course. Trees develop scars. Roads divide older patterns. Buildings appear, disappear and leave fragments behind.
Much of this history is visible, but rarely all at once. A landscape is not a finished composition. It is a surface continually rewritten by geology, climate, living organisms and occupation.
For artists and designers, this creates an important possibility. Pattern does not need to begin with ornament. It can begin with evidence. The marks, repetitions, interruptions and structures found within landscapes can be understood as records of processes that have occurred over time. In this sense, pattern becomes a form of memory.
Landscape Is Not Background
Landscape is often treated as scenery. It becomes the setting behind human activity, something viewed through a window, photographed from a lookout or reproduced in a painting.
This perspective places the observer outside the landscape. In reality, landscapes are active systems. They are made by geological processes, water, weather, vegetation, animals and human intervention. Their appearance at any particular moment is temporary. A valley records erosion. A riverbank records periods of flooding. A forest contains traces of disturbance and regeneration. An agricultural landscape records decisions about cultivation, access, property and labour.
The landscape therefore contains more than visual information. It contains history embedded in material form.
Geological Memory
Stone is one of the clearest records of deep time. Rock formations may preserve evidence of volcanic activity, sedimentation, pressure, folding, uplift and erosion that occurred millions or hundreds of millions of years ago.
The surface visible today represents only the current stage of a much longer process.
Cracks, veins, fractures and layers can all become visual records of forces acting through time.
For an artist, the significance lies not only in the appearance of the rock but in the processes that created it. A fractured surface can become a pattern of pressure. A sedimentary layer can become a rhythm of accumulation. A mineral vein can become a line of intrusion. Erosion can become a visual language of subtraction. These are not arbitrary decorative marks. They are evidence.
Erosion as Drawing
Water and wind repeatedly draw across the surface of the earth. Their marks can appear as gullies, channels, ripples, cliffs, river systems and eroded stone.
These processes operate at very different scales. A small channel formed by rainwater can resemble the branching form of a much larger river network. The resulting lines may appear almost intentionally drawn. Yet erosion has no artistic intention. Its forms emerge through relationships between material resistance, gravity, movement, volume and time.
For pattern design, this is particularly interesting. The visual structure can be translated without reproducing the landscape literally. A pattern derived from erosion might use directional movement, branching, irregular edges, interrupted lines or areas of accumulation. The landscape becomes a source of process rather than motif.
Water Records Movement
Water rarely leaves a landscape unchanged. It cuts, deposits, polishes, stains and redistributes materials. River systems reveal the history of movement through branching channels and changing edges. Floodplains record repeated inundation. Coastlines shift. Wetlands expand and contract. Even a single raindrop changes a surface temporarily.
The patterns associated with water therefore contain information about movement. They are dynamic rather than static.
An artist working with these ideas might allow pigments to migrate through fabric, permit water to create irregular edges or use repeated washes to build layers. The process of making then begins to echo the process being investigated. Water is no longer simply represented. It participates.
Botanical Memory
Plants also record their environments. A tree ring contains information about growth.
A twisted trunk may reveal repeated exposure to wind. Leaf damage can record insects, heat, disease or physical stress. A fallen tree can reveal internal structures that were previously invisible. Plants therefore possess histories written into their forms.
This is particularly important when botanical imagery is used in art and design. A leaf is not merely a recognisable silhouette. Its veins contain a history of development. Its tears and discolouration record events. Its asymmetry can reflect environmental conditions. Its eventual decay alters its form again. The botanical pattern is therefore not only biological. It is temporal.
Growth Creates Pattern
Many natural patterns arise because something is growing. Branches extend and divide. Roots explore space. Leaves arrange themselves in relation to one another. Cells multiply. Vines respond to available structures. Fungal networks expand through substrates. Growth produces repetition, but rarely perfect repetition. Structures emerge according to constraints. Light, gravity, water, competition and available space all influence the result.
This creates a useful principle for art and design. A pattern can be developed through rules of growth rather than through conventional repetition. One form can divide into several. Spacing can change. Density can increase or decrease. Elements can respond to neighbouring forms. The resulting work begins to resemble a system rather than a fixed repeat.
Fire and Disturbance
Landscapes also record destructive events. Fire can leave blackened trunks, altered soil, open canopy and new growth. Floods deposit debris. Storms remove vegetation. Drought changes colour and density.
Human disturbance can produce equally dramatic traces through clearing, mining, roads, agriculture and construction. These events may initially appear to interrupt the landscape. Over time they become part of its history. New patterns emerge. This complicates the idea of natural beauty.
A landscape may be visually compelling because of damage as well as growth. Scars become evidence of survival. Regeneration occurs beside destruction. The relationship between these two processes is central to Dangerous Beauty.
Memory Is Layered
Landscape memory is rarely contained within one visible layer. Geological history may lie beneath vegetation. Earlier land use may remain visible beneath later development. An abandoned road may survive as a line through new growth. A former building may remain through foundations, altered soil or fragments of material. Layers overlap.
This provides a useful model for visual composition.
A work does not need to reveal all of its information immediately. Patterns can be overprinted. Lines can disappear beneath colour. Fragments can remain partially visible. Earlier marks can influence later ones without remaining dominant. The resulting surface becomes an accumulation rather than a single gesture.
Palimpsest
The idea of the palimpsest is useful when thinking about landscapes. Historically, a palimpsest was a writing surface that had been reused, leaving traces of earlier text beneath the new.
Landscapes often behave similarly. A new road can overlay an earlier path. Agricultural boundaries can cross older ecological structures. Modern buildings can occupy earlier cultural sites. Vegetation can reclaim abandoned infrastructure. The earlier layer does not necessarily disappear. It remains partially legible.
Art can work in the same way. A pattern may contain traces of drawings that were subsequently covered. A textile may retain cracks from an earlier resist layer. A printed surface may reveal fragments of previous colours. The history of making remains embedded within the finished object.
Human Memory and Landscape
Landscape memory is not purely physical. People attach stories, identities and experiences to places. A street can become associated with generations of commercial activity. A building can carry memories far beyond its architectural form. A river can possess cultural significance that cannot be understood through hydrology alone. This means that landscape interpretation requires care.
A place has multiple histories. Some are visible in buildings and monuments. Others survive through oral history, cultural knowledge, names, traditions and continuing relationships with Country.
No single artwork can contain every layer. The artist’s responsibility is therefore not necessarily to claim completeness. It is to acknowledge that the landscape contains more memory than any one observer can see.
Maps as Pattern
Maps translate landscape into symbols. Roads become lines. Rivers become curves. Boundaries become edges. Buildings become shapes. Elevation becomes contour. The physical world is compressed into an abstract visual system.
This makes maps particularly relevant to pattern design. They demonstrate how place can be represented without pictorial realism. Historical maps are even more interesting because they record what was considered important at a particular moment in time. A road that once dominated movement may disappear. A property boundary may persist. A railway line can reshape the organisation of a town.
Maps therefore contain both geography and memory. Fragments of cartography can become a powerful source of visual abstraction.
Architecture as Landscape Memory
Buildings also become part of landscape memory. Materials record weather. Facades record alterations. Paint layers accumulate. Extensions reveal changing uses. Doors are moved. Windows are blocked or enlarged. Floors wear differently according to circulation.
A historic building is therefore not simply an architectural object. It is a material record of occupation. This is particularly relevant when architecture is translated into art. The most obvious response may be to reproduce the facade. A more interesting response might isolate: the rhythm of windows; the geometry of masonry; the curve of a staircase; the outline of a cornice; the surface of weathered timber; the plan of a room; or the relationship between old and later additions. Architecture then becomes pattern.
Repetition and Difference
Landscape patterns are characterised by repetition without exact duplication.
Fields repeat rectangular forms, but their dimensions vary.
Trees repeat vertical structures, but each is different. Rock formations repeat fractures and planes without creating identical units. This balance between repetition and difference creates visual coherence. It is also one of the most useful lessons for textile and surface design.
Conventional repeat patterns often reveal the size of their repeat quickly. The eye recognises the unit and begins predicting its recurrence. Natural pattern can behave differently. Variation interrupts prediction. Scale changes. Density changes. Forms overlap. Some elements disappear. This can make a pattern feel more alive because the viewer cannot immediately exhaust its structure.
Pattern and Scale
Landscape memory exists at multiple scales. From an aerial view, agricultural land may appear as geometric fields. The same landscape contains fences, grasses, machinery tracks and individual plants. At close range, a leaf reveals veins, hairs and damaged edges. Each scale provides a different visual language.
Art can move between these scales. A large geometric structure derived from a map can coexist with fine botanical detail. Microscopic patterns can be enlarged until they resemble landscapes. Aerial imagery can be reduced until it behaves like textile texture. Changing scale disrupts literal interpretation and allows the underlying structure to become visible.
Colour as Environmental Record
Colour also carries memory. The colour of a landscape changes according to season, rainfall, fire, geology, flowering, agricultural activity and time of day. A colour palette derived from place therefore need not be based on a single photograph. It can represent a sequence of conditions.
Dry grasses and new growth may belong to the same landscape. Storm light and summer glare may both be characteristic. Burnt black, mineral red, eucalyptus grey and flowering colour can coexist within the same visual vocabulary. This produces a more complex and truthful palette than attempting to identify one definitive “colour of place.”
The Problem of the Beautiful Landscape
There is a temptation in art and tourism to select only the most beautiful version of a landscape. The sky is clear. Vegetation is lush. Historic buildings are restored. Damage is removed from view.
Landscape memory includes less comfortable evidence: drought, fire, flooding, clearing, industrial activity, abandonment and decay.
If art excludes these elements entirely, it can turn landscape into an idealised image rather than an investigation. Dangerous Beauty is interested in the opposite possibility. Beauty can emerge through complexity. Damage and regeneration can exist together. The landscape can remain compelling without being perfected.
Material Process as Memory
The physical process of making can itself create memory. A textile remembers where wax resisted dye. Fabric retains stitch holes. Paper records pressure. A printing plate carries traces of previous impressions. Layers of paint influence the colour placed above them. Material processes therefore contain histories just as landscapes do.
This creates a direct connection between subject and method. If the artwork concerns erosion, the surface may itself be scraped or removed. If it concerns accumulation, layers can be built. If it concerns fracture, resist processes can produce cracks. If it concerns fading memory, earlier imagery can remain only partially visible. Process becomes part of meaning.
Batik, Resist and the Landscape Surface
Resist processes are particularly suited to the idea of landscape memory. Wax creates temporary boundaries. Dye moves around them. Cracks allow colour to penetrate unpredictably. Earlier layers are protected while later layers alter the surrounding surface. When the wax is eventually removed, several moments in the making process become visible simultaneously.
This resembles the layered nature of landscape. Some areas remain. Others change. Some marks are intentional. Others emerge through the physical behaviour of material. The final surface becomes a record of successive events.
Embroidery as Trace
Embroidery offers another form of recording. A stitched line moves slowly across a surface. It can follow a contour, repair a break, highlight a fragment or create an entirely new structure. Unlike printed pattern, stitch possesses a physical depth. The thread moves above and below the fabric.
It can therefore function almost like a path through a landscape. A stitched line may resemble: a river; a boundary; a geological seam; a route; a scar; or a line of memory. The association does not need to be literal. The act of stitching itself introduces time.
Gold and the Marking of Importance
Metallic details can be used to draw attention to particular fragments. Gold has historically carried associations with value, sacredness, repair and illumination.
Within a landscape-derived work, metallic intervention can therefore operate differently from ordinary colour.
It can mark a fault line. Highlight a historic fragment. Trace a botanical vein. Emphasise something that might otherwise disappear. The material becomes a form of annotation.
It says: look here.
Memory Does Not Require Accuracy
Artistic memory is not the same as archival documentation. A historical document seeks accuracy of date, location and fact. An artwork can work through compression, omission, association and ambiguity. This distinction is important when translating place into design.
A pattern inspired by a historic street does not need to reproduce every building accurately. A textile concerned with geological time does not need to function as a geological map. The art can be informed by research while remaining interpretive. Research establishes the depth of the source material. Art determines how that material is transformed.
From Documentation to Abstraction
The movement from landscape research to design can occur through several stages.
The first is documentation. Photographs, drawings, maps, historical sources and field observations establish what is present. The second is selection. Certain lines, forms, colours or relationships begin to stand out. The third is abstraction. Literal representation is reduced until the underlying visual structure becomes clearer. The fourth is translation. The abstract structure moves into textile, print, paint, embroidery or another material. The fifth is transformation. The behaviour of the material introduces new information that did not exist in the original source. At this point the work is no longer an illustration of the landscape. It has become an independent object carrying traces of its origin.
A Framework for Landscape-Derived Pattern
A landscape-based pattern practice can therefore follow a deliberate research process.
Begin by investigating place, including geology, ecology, history and human use. Observe the landscape at several scales rather than relying on a single view. Identify repeated structures, interruptions, boundaries and transformations. Record colour across different conditions and times. Study how processes such as growth, erosion, fire or construction created the forms being observed. Select visual relationships rather than simply attractive objects. Translate those relationships into line, shape, rhythm and material. Introduce controlled variation so the pattern does not become mechanically predictable. Allow the material process to modify the design. Retain traces of earlier stages rather than eliminating all evidence of making. The final pattern can then contain both place and process.
Molong and Deep Time
The Molong landscape offers a particularly rich example of this approach.
Its contemporary appearance contains multiple temporal scales.
Geological formations predate human history by immense periods. Vegetation records ecological and climatic relationships. Wiradjuri Country carries cultural knowledge and continuing relationships with place. European settlement introduced roads, agriculture, buildings and commercial structures. Later development altered these systems again.
An artwork derived from Molong therefore does not need to choose between geology and architecture. The layers can coexist. Stone can become colour and fracture. Historical maps can become line. Buildings can become rhythm and proportion. Plants can become texture. The work can move between deep time and relatively recent human history.
The Daintree and Biological Memory
The Daintree presents another kind of landscape memory. Here the dominant record is biological and evolutionary. The rainforest contains ancient plant lineages alongside continuous processes of competition, adaptation, decomposition and regeneration.
A fallen leaf becomes material for another organism. A gap in the canopy changes the distribution of light and can reshape growth below. Water continuously modifies the environment.
The resulting landscape contains no single moment of completion. Pattern derived from the Daintree therefore lends itself to layering, density, overlapping structures, hidden forms and variations in scale. The memory is not contained primarily in monuments. It is contained in living systems.
Celestial Vespers and Temporary Memory
Celestial Vespers operates at an even more transient scale. Twilight may last only a short time, yet it can completely alter the appearance of a familiar landscape. Colour shifts rapidly. Edges disappear. Artificial lights become visible. The sky changes before the eye can fully adjust.
This raises a different question about memory. How do we record something that disappears almost as soon as it is observed? Photography freezes one moment. Painting can combine several. Textile can translate the progression of colour into layers. Pattern can repeat a transition that never repeats exactly in nature. The artwork becomes a record of something inherently temporary.
Landscape and the Intelligence of Time
The idea of the intelligence of the natural world is closely connected with time.
Natural systems respond continuously to what has happened before.
A river follows pathways shaped by previous erosion. A tree grows around earlier damage. Vegetation changes according to disturbance. Soil contains the residue of previous life. The present landscape is therefore partly determined by its past.
Material retains consequence. For art and design, that idea is powerful. It suggests that a surface can carry its history rather than being continually returned to visual perfection.
Pattern as a Way of Reading
Pattern is often understood as something applied to a surface. It can also be a way of reading. The repeated marks in a landscape reveal relationships. Tracks show movement. Growth rings show time. Cracks show pressure. Layers show accumulation. Wear shows use.
Once we begin to recognise these signs, landscape changes. It becomes legible. The artist’s role can then be understood partly as selecting and translating this information so that viewers are encouraged to look again. A successful pattern does not necessarily explain the landscape. It can make the landscape more visible.
Conclusion
Landscapes are archives without pages. Their histories are written into stone, soil, vegetation, water, architecture and the marks left by human use. Some records extend across geological time. Others appear during a single season. Some are dramatic, such as fire or flood. Others accumulate so gradually that they become visible only after years.
Pattern provides a way of working with these histories. A fracture can become a line. A river can become movement. A map can become geometry. Growth can become repetition. Erosion can become subtraction. Decay can become texture. Architecture can become rhythm. None of these translations needs to reproduce the landscape literally.
Their value lies in retaining something of the processes that created the original form.
This is why pattern can become more than decoration. It can become a form of memory.
The artist does not simply look at the surface of a landscape and ask what is beautiful.
The more interesting questions are: What happened here? What remains? What has disappeared but left a trace? Which patterns were created by growth, and which by damage? What belongs to deep time, and what arrived only recently? When those questions enter the process of making, the resulting work begins to carry more than visual resemblance. It carries evidence of attention. And perhaps that is one of the most important functions of landscape-based art: not to reproduce a place, but to encourage us to recognise that every place is already full of stories written into its surface.
Research Context
This essay forms part of Kerry Ferguson’s continuing research into landscape, pattern, material and biophilic art and design.
It develops the idea that natural and man made landscapes can be understood as layered records of geological, ecological and cultural processes, and that these processes can be translated into contemporary visual language without relying on literal representation.
The research supports the development of Dangerous Beauty and its major collections, including Molong — The Place of Many Rocks, The Daintree Rainforest — 30 Million Years of Evolution and Celestial Vespers — Between Light and Dark.
Selected References
- Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge.
- Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Routledge
- Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press.
- Casey, E.S. (1996). How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: Phenomenological prolegomena. In S. Feld & K.H. Basso (Eds.), Senses of Place. School of American Research Press.
- Corner, J. (1999). The agency of mapping: Speculation, critique and invention. In D. Cosgrove (Ed.), Mappings. Reaktion Books.
- Cosgrove, D. (2008). Geography and Vision: Seeing, Imagining and Representing the World. I.B. Tauris.
- Spirn, A.W. (1998). The Language of Landscape. Yale University Press.
- Forman, R.T.T. & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape Ecology. Wiley.
- Turner, M.G. (1989). Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 171–197.
- Mandelbrot, B.B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W.H. Freeman.
- Taylor, R.P. (2006). Reduction of physiological stress using fractal art and architecture. Leonardo, 39(3), 245–251.
- Solnit, R. (2005). A Field Guide to Getting Lost. Viking.
- Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and Memory. Alfred A. Knopf.
- Kentridge, W. (2014). Six Drawing Lessons. Harvard University Press. Included for its relevance to drawing, erasure, process and layered visual memory.
- Krauss, R. (1979). Sculpture in the expanded field. October, 8, 30–44.